 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of Article - Opium Law?
editThe article is about Dutch drug laws. Looks like someone put a lot of time into this, but the article title does not seem quite right. APatcher (talk) 21:04, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Title
editThanks, I did indeed put a lot of work in it, I had to translate all drugs on both lists of the Opium Law from Dutch to English, though I found it worth the effort because there wasn't an English wiki about it yet. When I have some more time to spare, I'll expand the wiki article some more.
The article is titled how it should be though, the section of the Dutch law which covers (almost) all psychotropic drugs is the Opium Wet in Dutch, which translates to Opium Law in English.--Psych0-007 (talk) 23:45, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry for not being more specific. I didn't mean your translation was incorrect. I just wanted to address the issue of confusion when it comes to using the title "Opium Law". Several countries have such laws. I was thinking it could be changed to "Dutch Opium Law" or "Opium Law (Dutch)" or something else that would allow the researcher to be able to find this particular Dutch-specific law. APatcher (talk) 03:58, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
External links
editI have labelled one of the external links, to make clearer just what it links to
I would label the others as well, but I am not yet clear as to what labels would be appropriate for them
Laurel Bush (talk) 14:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
The reference links seem to be broken
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Opium Law. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080302223049/http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/pdf/Opiumwet_EN_29nov2004.pdf to http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/pdf/Opiumwet_EN_29nov2004.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080302223049/http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/pdf/Opiumwet_EN_29nov2004.pdf to http://www.cannabisbureau.nl/pdf/Opiumwet_EN_29nov2004.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071024151904/http://www.cannabis-med.org/dutch/Regulations/Opium_Act_Decree.pdf to http://www.cannabis-med.org/dutch/Regulations/Opium_Act_Decree.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Ketamine?
edit"Most non-psychotropic, but prescription-only drugs are covered by the Medicine Act, the most well known exception being Ketamine which is covered by the Medicine Act." So, most prescription drugs are covered by the Medicine Act, except for Ketamine, which is covered by the Medicine Act?
I'm confused. Let me restate that line in the hopes that someone can clear this up so the text can be made more clear. Prescriptions are covered by the Medicine Act, except for Ketamine, because Ketamine is covered by the Medicine Act.
Where is my logic wrong? Has incorrect information been added here? Or is the text just written in a way that is immediately confusing to me? Figure I'll ask here before I start going all Google Translate after searching for Dutch government sites. (There's no citation, so it's not a super easy thing to be solved in 5 minutes. I'm hoping that somebody's watching this page!Jtrnp (talk) 03:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)