Talk:Orbiting Astronomical Observatory
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 84.67.3.210 in topic You don't have to be a star, baby
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Orbiting Astronomical Observatory article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
You don't have to be a star, baby
editWasn't it proposed OAO be used to study or count asteroids? TREKphiler hit me ♠ 04:36, 24 October 2009 (UTC)
The bottom panel with Space observatories seems to be missing a reference to TD-1a, which produced the first catalogue of the UV brightness of stars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.67.3.210 (talk) 15:07, 8 September 2020 (UTC)