 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Since when does me being the only contributor mean that this page gets deleted? It's a real place, see Streetmap. First I get told it's unreferenced when all I can go on is the fact that I live there, and now I'm being told that it's only worth deleting because I'm the only contributor. Are you interested in my contributions at all? -- Roleplayer 18:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hi! Please review Wikipedia:No original research and if you still have questions, contact me on my talk page. Cheers, Blastolite 18:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- According to the very first sentence of that policy that doesn't apply here, for the simple reason that this is a real place that really exists. I suggest you need to read the policies you're spouting out about to me. -- Roleplayer 19:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- While you are wrong about the policy not applying (it is considered original research), you have created a reference. Thanks for your help on Wikipedia. Cheers Blastolite 20:03, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- According to the very first sentence of that policy that doesn't apply here, for the simple reason that this is a real place that really exists. I suggest you need to read the policies you're spouting out about to me. -- Roleplayer 19:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Second nomination for speedy deletion on the same day
editI really don't see what this user has against this article, seeing as it's an article, however short, about a real place, it says where that place is, and above on this same talk page is a link showing where that place is. Why is this page in particular being targeted over all others for annihilation? -- Roleplayer 19:06, 10 December 2006 (UTC)