Material from Easy-listening was split to Orchestral pop on May 3, 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:Easy-listening.
Orchestral pop is within the scope of the Music genres task force of the Music project, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardize music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the task force guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good article status.Music/Music genres task forceWikipedia:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forceTemplate:WikiProject Music/Music genres task forcemusic genre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
In this article, Nickson is clearly describing orchestral pop in 1966 as a challenging version of easy listening: "while there's plenty that recalls the vital orchestral pop of 1966 (i.e. challenging, rather than vapid, easy listening)..." Is it the commas between challenging and easy listening that you're overlooking?, because I don't understand why you're misrepresenting the source as saying he's making a distinction between orchestral pop and easy listening as one being more challenging than the other. This source doesn't support the sentence, "In 1966, some sectors of orchestral pop were more challenging than easy-listening." Dan56 (talk) 20:48, 4 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
"It's not Nickson's job to be a grammar nazi" ...He's a professional writer. There's numerous ways to read that sentence and they're all equally as valid. "Challenging easy listening, rather than vapid" / "Challenging, instead of vapid easy listening" / "Demanding music, instead of background music". There's no way to know. But in any case, deriving "all orchestral pop is easy listening" from "the 'vital orchestral pop of 1966' is easy listening" is WP:SYNTH. 1967–70 Scott Walker as easy listening? Really?--Ilovetopaint (talk) 16:03, 5 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
