Talk:Orders of magnitude (area)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Discussion
editThis article needs to take a similar format to other Order of Magnitude pages - see column headings Ian Cairns 00:18, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Done. May be riddled with errors. I tried to choose examples that people can relate to, btw, rather than trivia. One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 03:38, 18 May 2005 (UTC)
For anyone looking for the discussion on the merge, it's at Talk:Orders of magnitude (length) and Talk:Orders of magnitude (volume). —One-dimensional Tangent (Talk) 22:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
10^12 "1 square megametre (Mm^2)= 1 million m^2" is a spelling mistake and should state 1 million km^2 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.206.147.254 (talk) 10:02, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Consider adding 1 fb^-1 = 10^(-43) m^2 - the femtobarn is often used as a unit of area in particle physics, to the extent where it has its own section in the article on the barn as a unit[1]. Henryeshbaugh (talk) 23:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Metrication
editI've been working for about two hours on this, PLEASE DO NOT REVERT. The page has proper metrication now down to the mm. I have also used only major prefixes, mm, m km etc squared. dm are cm are deprecated for proper scaling here, but they are included. Note how the table is much clearer this way. Again, please do not revert without using the talk page. --Cpt ricard (talk) 05:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Using metric system is the way to go. However, I would suggest to use M(m²) instead of km² etc. Reason for this is that it is much harder for the brain to process a squared prefix. If you think it is too futuristic, I would suggest we for the moment keep both systems. --Warpi 2021-07-21
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Orders of magnitude (area). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080821211324/http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter4/table8.html to http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/chapter4/table8.html
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20111027183121/http://www.usabasketball.com:80/rules/rules.html to http://www.usabasketball.com/rules/rules.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061126120208/http://ts.nist.gov:80/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/h4402_appenc.pdf to http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/h4402_appenc.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061126120208/http://ts.nist.gov:80/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/h4402_appenc.pdf to http://ts.nist.gov/WeightsAndMeasures/Publications/upload/h4402_appenc.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:11, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
new spain area
edit980000 KM² INC SPANISH GUYANA — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.93.247.123 (talk) 23:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Conversion to yottametres is incorrect
editThe conversion for the area of the observable universe is incorrect. 2.7E53 is not 2700 Yottametres — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dickpenn (talk • contribs) 12:52, 31 August 2019 (UTC)