Talk:Ordnance sergeant

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ordnance sergeant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/Base/3964/ordnance.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:15, 4 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed article on caretaker detachment

I'm thinking of creating a short article on military caretaker detachments in general, planning on the title "Caretaker (military)". One issue is that this article is linked to "caretaker" in a number of articles. However, this article is specific to the US and Confederate armies, and the US Army discontinued the rank of Ordnance Sergeant in 1920, though use of caretaker detachments was common through 1940 or so. An article on the general subject of military caretakers would be more open to including other countries' situations and post-1920 caretaking efforts. Comments are welcome. RobDuch (talk) 04:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

• The linking of this article via caretaker or caretaker detachment, as apparently has been done, is definitely suboptimal and essentially wrong; as it is about the rank and not ordnance personnel or ordnance duties in general and also doesn´t include other caretaker duties or positions. So a new article and a correction of said links wouldn´t be wrong. However I suppose if you want more input the best way is to directly bring it to the talk page of WPMILHIST. ...GELongstreet (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)