Talk:Oregon v. Mitchell

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Oregon Mid‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Link to Congress decision that started this whole thing

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Article says that "Congress had passed an act requiring all states to register citizens between the ages of 18 and 21 as voters." Is there a link to this decision somewhere? Aslaveofaudio (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

mainly moot

Latest comment: 4 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Elsewhere (Twitter in particular), my neutral point of view has been called into question on my edit in 969695589. While its true that my motivations were perhaps less than pure, I think my neutral point of view remained intact. Others may disagree, and in an effort at full disclosure, mention it here. If any editor disagrees with my edit here, I invite you to undo it. I would, however, appreciate a mention here or on my talk page. Thanks. Rklahn (talk) 06:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I don't know about (or care to get involved with) your Twitter dispute, but I will say that the part of the case that upheld the Voting Rights Act's ban on literacy tests and other discriminatory practices is not "moot" and continues to be in force today. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 17:46, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I wish I had never gotten involved either. I could digress, but wont. Thanks for your time and edit. I think it made a huge improvement. Rklahn (talk) 19:08, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have changed the wording in the lead to more accurately describe the relationship between this case and the Twenty-sixth Amendment. –Prototime (talk · contribs) 17:58, 29 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic