Talk:Origo Gentis Langobardorum

This is somewhere between a summary and a free translation at present. dab (ᛏ) 16:45, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

---

This article is not, in fact, a summarization of Origo Gentis Langobardorum, as its page title claims, but a parallel to the history of the Lombards, which already has a Wikipedia article. Hence it is misleading: caveat lector.--Wetman 00:55, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

---

I have made a bold edit . The 'summary' is now mentioned in the article as 'free translation' . Sechinsic (talk) 21:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Origo Gentis Langobardorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.searchlores.org/ORIGOGENTISLANGOBARDORUMWAITZ.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Suspect manuscript photos

The photos of the manuscripts, one from Berlin and the other from Salerno, do not seem to be manuscripts of the Origo gentis langobardorum. The article itself says that the only three manuscripts are elsewhere. I was able to track down images of two of the actual manuscripts (Modena and Madrid) and neither of these are the ones in the photos. More likely these are manuscripts of Paul the Deacon's History of the Lombards, a much more common text. Someone needs to fix this. Note that fixing this would extend to the Commons where the misattribution seems to have originated. 24.91.105.62 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)

the one with pictures is "Cava de' Tirreni, Biblioteca della Badia, 4". "'La Biblioteca Statale del Monumento Nazionale della Badia di Cava (Salerno)'" is the oficcial name of it:) So the description is very accurate. The other one also contains a very accurate description (I mean Ms. Phill. 1886), but it seems to be Historia Langobardorum. --90.154.72.166 (talk) 08:38, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

• Biblioteca statale del Monumento Nazionale Badia di Cava (formerly Biblioteca statale del Monumento nazionale della Abbazia Benedettina della Ss. Trinità) and La Trinità della Cava, the abbey. "Badia" is "Abbazia". :Cava de' Tirreni is near Salerno and in Salerno (the city and province). see map
• http://www.bibliotecabadiadicava.it/index.php?com=statics&option=index&id=2485 (library website).
• http://www.leges.uni-koeln.de/en/mss/codices/cava-dei-tirreni-bdb-4/ (description of the codex).
• http://www.leges.uni-koeln.de/wp-content/uploads/pdf/auszuege_mordek/mordek_cava-dei-tirreni-bdb-4.pdf (more detailed description, it mentions the picture:))

--90.154.72.166 (talk) 09:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)

Regarding the other codex (without pictures): the text looks like Historia Langobardorum. It is said to be "Ms. Phil. 1886".

• description of Ms. Phill. 1886 in the catalogue.
• description in Bethmann and Waitz, MGH SRL, 79. In Waitz' classification it is G6.

THis is about Ms. Phill. 1886. I didn't check if the text in the picture is what is described.--90.154.72.166 (talk) 21:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)