Talk:Orthex

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MER-C in topic Copyright problem


edit

A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

A paid editor made contributions to this article, and has disclosed that fact on this page, therefore the paid contributions template is a matter of fact and does not require discussion. Beyond My Ken (talk) 13:44, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

I removed the template as content seemed to be ok when I readed it through. --Zache (talk) 12:33, 24 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I dropped finnish version of the article to a peer review. fi:Wikipedia:Vertaisarviointi#Orthex to get baseline for what users think is non-neutral or advetsement. I did it in finnish wikipedia as the article is pretty much same than in enwiki and if we think that there is problems in enwikis version then it is likely that it should be edited in fiwiki's version too. Another reason was that finnish wikipedia editors have better access to the used sources (both in terms of ability to read finnish but also through paywalls) and general knowledge on what the Orthex is. @Praxidicae: You tagged the article with Advert and cleanup-pr. I would like to get some comments from enwiki too do so would you open up for your reasons for those tags? (I can guess, but i try to textualize WHAT and WHY certain things in the article are problems so I would prefer also to get opinnions other than my own) --Zache (talk) 06:48, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I made some cleaning up and rewording now. Some notes. I don't think that the Ilta-Sanomat article can be used to say that the Jäänalle is most common item in households in Finland. The method how the researched that is not good enough for that. However, I think that it can be used to say that the item/items are very common in Finland and it is notable item in company's context and product can be described in the article. However, there are other products too (in example 10 liter bucket is even more iconic) which could and if somebody will write about them then it would be good idea to summarize them. The biocomposite is something which could be worth of own article or part of some biocomposite related article in someform, but it would require references (which i didn't try to find). --Zache (talk) 07:44, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

  This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 10:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)Reply