This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article was accepted on 12 October 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk·contribs).
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Comment: Is there a reason you removed the sources I recommended? They're stronger than what you have footnoted now. I've restored them as "Further Reading" but recommend you turn them to footnotes to strengthen your sourcing. Also, the MCA link doesn't say a word about the Orwell; "references" means "this link proves something about the subject", don't just footnote to other things you happen to mention. Also, don't use "{" to make wikilinks, use "[", you threw off the coding when you use the wrong symbol to bracket England. No harm done, easy fix. But the sources are the key issue right now, and you need stronger footnotes. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:38, 12 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
Comment: Is there a reason you removed the sources I recommended? They're stronger than what you have footnoted now. I've restored them as "Further Reading" but recommend you turn them to footnotes to strengthen your sourcing. Also, the MCA link doesn't say a word about the Orwell; "references" means "this link proves something about the subject", don't just footnote to other things you happen to mention. Also, don't use "{" to make wikilinks, use "[", you threw off the coding when you use the wrong symbol to bracket England. No harm done, easy fix. But the sources are the key issue right now, and you need stronger footnotes. MatthewVanitas (talk) 05:38, 12 October 2014 (UTC)