Talk:Osteitis fibrosa cystica
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Seabreezes1 in topic Under Causes
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Osteitis fibrosa cystica article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: Index, Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
Osteitis fibrosa cystica has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Osteitis fibrosa cystica.
|
This article was intensively edited as a Fall 2008 / Spring 2009 educational assignment: WikiProject AP Biology 2008. We invite you to join us to make further improvements and changes. We are not claiming any sort of ownership. This is a project in collaboration. |
Automate archiving?
editDoes anyone object to me setting up automatic archiving for this page using MiszaBot? Unless otherwise agreed, I would set it to archive threads that have been inactive for 30 days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Oneiros (talk • contribs) 18:03, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- An archive was created by ClueBot III in October 2009 (history). The old discussions had not been removed from this page, so I did that in my previous edit (diff). — Athaenara ✉ 04:35, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ah. Anyway, I've set up automatic archiving and archive indexing, although the archiving will kick in only after more then ten threads.--Oneiros (talk) 04:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
To-do
editBecause I'll probably end up coming back to this as a way to procrastinate for things in the real world:
- Add pathophysiology diagram
- Gross tumor images
- Expand sections or merge them
- Parathyroid adenoma
- Parathyroid carcinoma
- Renal complications
- Pathophysiology
- Epidemiology
- Medical Management
- Surgical Management
- Prognosis
- Blood testing details (normal levels, interpretations, reliability)
- More on Cysts
- Check licensing on images
- Copyedit for medical jargon
Strombollii (talk) 23:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
- So you're planning to do more work here huh?--NYMFan69-86 (talk) 00:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it needs it. HahaStrombollii (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's pretty well off...if you need sources, your university library is likely stockpiled with 'em. If you need help, give me a jingle. :-) NYMFan69-86 (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, getting access to sources isn't a problem. Finding sources about a disease like OFC is the tough part. Strombollii (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I could just well imagine. Especially in the field of medicine, older literature is likely outdated. That leaves only very current books and online sources, the latter of which may be largely speculative. Good luck.NYMFan69-86 (talk) 02:43, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, getting access to sources isn't a problem. Finding sources about a disease like OFC is the tough part. Strombollii (talk) 03:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's pretty well off...if you need sources, your university library is likely stockpiled with 'em. If you need help, give me a jingle. :-) NYMFan69-86 (talk) 01:19, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it needs it. HahaStrombollii (talk) 20:55, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Under Causes
editAnyone involved in dialysis knows that the water must be fluoride free. I suggest this well reference edit should be reinstated. Comments?