Talk:Osteodontornis
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Apokryltaros in topic should this page be merged?
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
should this page be merged?
editoh, it seem that may be a junior synonym of cyphornis....is merge now or not until a different paper published? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samweithe4 (talk • contribs) 03:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- No. No merge until more research is done to prove that Osteodontornis is Cyphornis, especially since, you bothered to read the latter's article, the latter is only known from an eroded chunk of bone.--Mr Fink (talk) 04:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)