This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Otogosaurus redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merger proposal
editI can find no evidence that "Otogosaurus" was validly named and this page cites no publications. Unless a source can be provided, this page should be merged with Informally named dinosaurs. Carnoferox (talk) 18:43, 17 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Carnoferox: Have you tried searching for sources yet? 2001:4453:5FA:FE00:146D:FEA4:DFFD:B666 (talk) 14:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have searched and there is no formal publication that named this taxon. Carnoferox (talk) 19:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
- I guess I should merge this, then... Miracusaurs (talk) 05:16, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Carnoferox: While researching further, I have found a mention in the fifth supplement of Glut's Dinosaurs: The Encyclopedia. But, as he writes, "the paper is not available to the author at the time of writing (2008)". Interestingly, it is not in the "nomen nudum" section of the book. What should we do? Miracusaurs (talk) 08:31, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
- I have searched and there is no formal publication that named this taxon. Carnoferox (talk) 19:17, 5 July 2022 (UTC)