Talk:Ottawa Gee-Gees

Ottawa Mid‑importance

	Ontario portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ottawa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ottawa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OttawaWikipedia:WikiProject OttawaTemplate:WikiProject OttawaOttawa articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canadian football

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canadian football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canadian football and the Canadian Football League on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Canadian footballWikipedia:WikiProject Canadian footballTemplate:WikiProject Canadian footballCanadian football articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Sport Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian sport.

Garnet

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I can't seem to match the colour Garnet. I know it a maroon shade but I can't seem to get the right Hex#. - Coppercanuck (talk) 15:49, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've taken the hex that uOttawa uses from http://web5.uottawa.ca/assets-templates/themes/03/main.css DoubleBlue (Talk) 19:39, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

POV

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Ive placed a pov tag here. Theres a few issues with this article, that seems to use alot of unsourced events to declare teams the most succeful or best. The article could use a bit of trimming. Willing to discuss further Ottawa4ever (talk) 16:58, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic