This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Measurement, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.MeasurementWikipedia:WikiProject MeasurementTemplate:WikiProject MeasurementMeasurement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It's missing the rottol (Ottoman Turkish: رطل, ratl, "pound") and pretends that the Ottoman Empire had a universal system of measures. It didn't: the same units varied from city to city and even from trade to trade within a city. See the quote at rottol's Wiktionary entry for a taste of the chaos. If there was a nominal standardization, great, mention it... but, for the most part, these values need to be given as ranges.
In the main text or in the footnotes, the article should address at least the most common variant spellings and names of each of these units: e.g., oka, okka, oke; ratl, rottol, rotl, rotolo, "pound"; cantaro, kintal, quintal... — LlywelynII00:55, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
