Talk:Our Love to Admire

Untitled

The album is still untitled, is it not? If you are going to change the title to Mammoth, please cite your sources.

Release date of June 4th/5th not confirmed by band

However, their front page of their official site says 07.10.07 - pretty much confirmation from the band that July 10 is the album's release date.

http://www.interpolnyc.com/

- Slagkick

Magic Shop Studios

It's in New York, not SF. http://www.magicshopny.com/

Slagkick 12:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Pitchfork Review

The review by Pitchfork of Our Love to Admire doesn't appear in the professional reviews column, despite Pitchfork reviews usually appearing on wikipedia articles of albums. I would put it in myself but I'm afraid I don't know how to. 220.253.166.240 12:28, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

I added it for you. In the future, you can just try yourself (in this case e.g. by copying a previous review in the source of the article and changing the details), that's why we have a "preview" button. You can try and change it and with using "preview" you will not change the article itself until you figured out, how it should be done. =) --SoWhy ^Talk 12:47, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

the 'Pioneer to the Falls' instrumental

I need to know, from the band's viewpoint, the thinking and origin behind that song. I'll also need a web-reference or two please, thank you.--MurderWatcher1 19:41, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

LP Controversy?

The Section entitled LP Controversy has absolutely no citations and seems to me to be the ramblings of a disgruntled Interpol fan. Not only that, but there seems to be no controversy in the first place. In any case, here is the text I find questionable:

"The distribution of Our Love to Admire has been heavily criticized by vinyl record collectors for poor quality. A number of such records were returned due to warped surfaces and weak sleeves. Some sleeves were reported to come torn on their sides, while some gate fold covers were also reported to have come unglued, causing records to fall out when opened."

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.238.71 (talk) 18:45, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I agree, I couldn't find any sources to support this so I've removed the section. snigbrook (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2009 (UTC)