Our Man Bashir has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 9, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Our Man Bashir appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Untitled
editWeren't there some interesting legal shenanigans about this one? Morwen - Talk 08:23, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Andrew Robinson did an interview for startrek.com in which he inferred that they couldn't do any sequels to this episode due to the 007 license holders having threatened some action. If anyone has more specific information, they should add it. That would be deserving of an entire section. --69.124.112.126 (talk) 02:56, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
From here to The Quickening (Star Trek: Deep Space Nine), the episode numbers don't agree with what is shown in List_of_Star_Trek:_Deep_Space_Nine_episodes#Season_4_(1995-1996). Is there some reason for this (broadcast order vs shooting order possibly)? It may need to be explained or the contradiction removed. Warreed (talk) 08:57, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Our Man Bashir/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zanimum (talk · contribs) 21:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
Frigg, I reviewed almost the whole article (save for paragraphs 2-4 of plot) last night in Notepad. Then Notepad crashed. How the heck does Notepad crash?
I was going to ask whether Holodeck and Holosuite should be capitalized, but then I saw the template at the bottom.
Passing "Footnotes", "References", "External links". (Nothing good on StarTrek.com to reference?) -- Zanimum (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Only thing on the episode at StarTrek.com is this, which is just an episode description. Miyagawa (talk) 22:49, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
I can't find the review I did, so restarting. Only minimal changes on "Production". No changes needed for "Reception and home media release", it looks solid. -- Zanimum (talk) 23:45, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
Passing "Plot", images. Passing lead, I just switch the linking location on Avery's name. GA! -- Zanimum (talk) 23:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)