This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks, User:Bkissin for identifying 3 sources which can be used to improve the article. I am especially glad to know about the 2004-05 architectural survey, although the version found is an incomplete draft, because it shows there was an effort to provide a lot more specific info eventually, while the original NRHP nomination document was skimpy. Early years of NRHP program did not require much documentation. The other two sources are good too. These are:
About AFC status, i think the topic is already clearly wikipedia-notable and the article is adequately developed already to be in mainspace, but I don't mind developing it more with these sources. By the way I rounded up a good number of pictures within Commons to put into the Commons category for the district. Previously it was hard/impossible to know which buildings in Ouray were in the district; the current article provides description of bounds of the district (distilled from a nearly incomprehensible description in the NRHP document) and link to a map outlining the district which wasn't previously known by me or others. --Doncram (talk) 00:40, 5 February 2022 (UTC)Reply