Talk:Out Campaign

Atheism Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For more information and how you can help, click the [Show] link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity

To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Add a userbox to your page ({{User WikiProject Atheism}} or {{User WPA2}}) and attract potential members.
Help with articles.
See this month's adopt-an-article.
Help out with this to-do list.

Be consistent

Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Find sources for all positions of an article (see Citing sources and atheism references).
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
Watch the list of atheism-related articles and add to accordingly.
Always write for an encyclopedia.

Articles to improve

Agnosticism

Create

Articles on notable atheists

Expand

an atheism stub

Immediate attention

State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.

Article premature

Latest comment: 15 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Richard Dawkins is notable, no question about that. But I think this article is premature for the time being. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 19:38, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Now we're talking :-) --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 21:34, 30 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

It cites two newspaper articles, which is good enough for me. Richard001 (talk) 05:22, 19 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

the link for scarlet A goes to the old version of the term and there is no infomation concerning the athiest "A" when directed to that link? Can someone fix this? i am new at this so i wouldn't know where to begin. actually i do. from the beginning Dah, but i am to lazy right now.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.7.195.68 (talk) 23:27, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Literary Origins

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It should be noted that the origins of the scarlet "A" come from The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, where one of protagonists in the story wears a "scarlet 'A'" on her clothes as form of identification of what she has done. 131.75.34.70 (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Out Campaign. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080527030626/http://dogmafreeamerica.libsyn.com:80/index.php?post_id=246127 to http://dogmafreeamerica.libsyn.com/index.php?post_id=246127

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic