Talk:Outline of parapsychology

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Kortoso in topic Essence of parapsychology

Untitled

edit

Dear Sirs,

Please somebody add something about DMILS - Direct Mental Interaction with Living Systems to the parapsychology articles.

Thank you all

Alberto

Contradiction between articles

edit

The parapsychology entry clearly calls parapsychology a pseudoscience whereas the outline of Parapsychology entry calls parapsychology a fringe science. Owing to the fact that this contradiction could cause confusion for readers, I intend to switch the entry on this page to read pseudoscience in order to make things clearer for people. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Skeptic93 (talkcontribs) 02:27, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit

The lead of this article was a copy of the Parapsychology lead, hence a license violation. I have removed it for now. Please do not restore without addressing this issue. Verbal chat 10:48, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Essence of parapsychology

edit

This seems like an odd section title. Alternatives or justifications? Verbal chat 10:49, 12 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

I concur. It's concerning that nobody has noticed this or cared. Kortoso (talk) 22:53, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Name

edit

This is a list, supported by guidelines and policy. I see no local or general consensus for moves to "outline of". Verbal chat 05:18, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

How many of these deuced outline pagemoves are there? It seems that half my watchlist for the past week has been nothing but undiscussed moves (plus a WikiProject Mathematics discussion). Please can we try to get local consensus before moving any other pages? And maybe even improve this page a little? For the record, this is clearly a list; are there any arguments based in policy or logic indicating otherwise? - 2/0 (cont.) 19:05, 14 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved by silent consensus. No prejudice against future move requests. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 18:48, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply


List of parapsychology topicsOutline of parapsychologyRelisted. Vegaswikian (talk) 01:56, 26 August 2011 (UTC) Since there has been several move-reverts in 2009, requesting a move instead of moving myself. To match every other outline page in Category:Outlines per WikiProject Outlines naming convention. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 08:12, 19 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Outline of parapsychology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:29, 26 July 2017 (UTC)Reply