Talk:Overdrawn at the Memory Bank/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by GamerPro64 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SL93 (talk · contribs) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply


I appreciate that you fixed the issues that were raised in the earlier peer review. SL93 (talk) 00:36, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • I ran Earwig and everything checks out. I see that the issues were taken care of and I added the newspaper.com clippings.

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:  
Manual of Style compliance:  

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:  
Citations to reliable sources, where required:  
No original research:  

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:  
Focused:  

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:  

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):  

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  


Overall:

Pass or Fail:   SL93 (talk) 03:04, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply