Talk:Ovulatory shift hypothesis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll take on this one. Reviewer: Chiswick Chap (talk · contribs) 20:19, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Comments

• The lead does not cover the full range of topics mentioned in the article. Basically each section should be mentioned, even if in many cases only by a single word (as you've done for many of the sections already).

• This article could clearly be enlivened with a few well-chosen images.

• Please wikilink terms such as Adaptation, Estradiol.

• "who exhibit", "may exhibit", "exhibit increases" - why not just say "have"? Occasionally this takes a little rearrangement, but the result is nearly always simpler (aka better), e.g. "testosterone increases in men exposed to ...".

• Someone's last name probably isn't "Ph.D" I shouldn't think. Please remove all "Ph D" mentions.

• The date is missing from several journal papers. I've marked several "date needed" (delete that when you've fixed each one). You might find it easier to use the DOI Wikipedia reference generator http://reftag.appspot.com/doiweb.py to replace each of those references.

• Some authors are in BLOCK CAPITALS. Please use Title Case.

Summary

I've made some very minor copy-edits which I hope are to your liking. The article is I believe better for the changes made during this review and I am happy to award it GA status now. I do hope you will take a moment to look through the list of GA nominations and to review an article now and again. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

@Chiswick Chap: Thank you so much for your tasteful and simplifying edits, thoughtful and thorough review, and all of your help and guidance throughout the creation of this article! I will definitely try to pay it forward by reviewing more articles. MountainRose (talk) 16:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

My pleasure. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:06, 11 January 2018 (UTC)