This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Keep.
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I removed the section on his teaching because the source did not support the material. Yaysonjeehk, now that you have added some of it back, I will give you a chance to find a source that supports what that sentence says. His web page does not say that he regularly teaches three courses; it lists twelve courses. It says nothing about his method of teaching. I understand that you would like to say something about his teaching, but unless there is a published source that says what you want to say, you must leave it out. The article includes a link to his faculty page, which does list his courses. He is an expert in the teaching of computer science, how to teach it and how not to teach it. I suggest reading some of his papers and adding material sourced to that instead. Just adding what you know is not proper for an encyclopedia article. StarryGrandma (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A "Selected publications" section is standard in articles about professors, and I have added back the one I added earlier. They do not need some independent publication to show that these are the most important - they don't need to be the most important in fact. I usually add the most cited, but also enough to illustrate a researcher's development. They only need to be written by the person and in that sense they are self-citing. StarryGrandma (talk) 06:11, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Disagree. "The most cited"--I don't see where that is verified either. Listing professors' articles is not standard procedure, and in many of the sciences it would be a ridiculous proposition. This is not LinkedIn and we don't publish resumes. Listing books makes sense: presumably books by academics of some standing received reviews, which is precisely how the NPROF bar can be proven. This article, BTW, doesn't cite one single secondary source--it cites the subject's own articles, a number of press releases, a few primary web pages, and the subject's CV. Drmies (talk) 12:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
