Talk:Owler
Latest comment: 7 years ago by 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 in topic COI edits by Mgc5256?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Owler article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
COI edits by Mgc5256?
editHistory suggests Mgc5256 may have a conflict of interest. Removing the spam section was particularly suspicious. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 (talk) 02:42, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
You do realize that Twitter is not a legitimate source, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mgc5256 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)
- On the contrary, Wikipedia policy is that "A specific tweet may be useful as a self-published, primary source." See Twitter as a reliable source. The claim is that the company has been accused of spam on Twitter, and the links are to specific, concrete, documented allegations of spam on Twitter. 2620:0:1000:1601:48EC:9A93:5902:46A5 (talk) 04:17, 2 February 2017 (UTC)