Talk:Oxford Circus tube station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TheMagikCow (talk · contribs) 17:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria'

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:

   All reliable. No issues. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused (see summary style):

   Compared to others, has more content. All sections necessary and concise. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   All own work or out of copyright. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

   Good captions. Alt text could be improved, but not a GA requirement though. TheMagikCow (talk) 13:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Convinced that an ordinary reader could get lots of detail from this article.

I have changed a section heading per the MoS. otherwise, this is a great article and I am happy to pass it as a GA. TheMagikCow (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)