Talk:Oxford Royale Academy

Request for Clarification on Reverted Edits to Oxford Royale Academy Page

I dedicated a considerable amount of time to enhancing the quality of the Oxford Royale Academy page. Initially, I refined the English for clarity and coherence. Additionally, I incorporated Wikipedia hyperlinks to key information within the page to enrich it further. It's important to note that I neither added nor removed any content; my sole contribution was the inclusion of a logo. I'm perplexed as to why my modifications were entirely reverted without any justification. Could you please provide some insight into this decision? Naxh (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

@Naxh: The major concern was that you removed referencing without explanation i.e. your edits reduced the number of citations in the References section from 47 citations by 10 down to 37. However, on further review, you did make some enhancements so I have restored some of those. You can continue to edit and clean up, but please 1) be careful not to delete things unless necessary, 2) use the edit summary to explain any significant deletions or changes; 3) be careful of overlinking common terms. Hope this explains things. Dl2000 (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Good morning, and thank you for your comment. I edit only during my free time, as I enjoy reading Wikipedia pages. The references I removed were eliminated due to redundancy or because they were no longer functional. I appreciate your contributions, great work! Naxh (talk) 12:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)