Talk:Pécrot rail crash

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belgium

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

It would not be unreasonable to have a small railway langauge like seaspeak that contains enough essential phrases for Flemish and French speakers to make some sense of each other.

Tabletop 06:22, 20 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

The main responsability is to the SNCB/NMBS: they have installed no train-controlling system. Now what has changed: they have given GSM to the agents and that's all!!! (87.67.158.139)

How can a train with no power proceed, even slowly?

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article confuses me: surely if the current is cut of the train will grind to a halt anyway aftyer a few hundred yards - the hills round Pécrot aren't steep. So how can there be a "ruling" that drivers have to slow down? It seems superfluous. TobyJ (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic