 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
PA-7200 vs. PA-7100
editThere are divergent opinions on whether the PA-7200 was a shrink of the 7100 core or a new design. This should be taken into account.
P
- Certainly, if reliable sources say so. The Hewlett-Packard Journal could be considered to be the "official" statement of HP, and the Microprocessor Report is an authoritative independent source, so I chose to state their views only. Of course, they may be others that I am not aware of. May I ask which source(s) are of the opinion that the PA-7200 is a separate development and not a derivative of the PA-7100? Rilak (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I cannot really grasp where Wikipedia is heading here, with editors writing articles that seem to be authorative, but in the end are only based on "I chose to state their views only"? Have fun diluting information further; I'm sure everyone is helped greatly by this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.1.45 (talk) 15:21, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
- I am not sure I understand your comment. Are you saying that it is detrimental to the article to cite the HPJ and MPR as sources to support what it says? Rilak (talk) 07:18, 25 May 2009 (UTC)