Talk:UY Sextantis

(Redirected from Talk:PG 1047+003)
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Queen of Hearts in topic Requested move 26 July 2024

UY Sex or Y Sex?

edit

The infobox is contradictory, it lists this as UY Sex and Y Sextantis

76.66.197.2 (talk) 07:38, 19 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 24 February 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. No consensus for move after 1 month. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:02, 27 March 2024 (UTC)Reply


PG 1047+003UY Sextantis – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars that have no Bayer or Flamsteed designations, the Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) number, variable-star designation or the Gliese number should be used for the article name about the star. As PG 1047+003 has no HD number or Gliese number, the variable-star designation UY Sextantis should be used. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 16:42, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Weak support While the variable star designation is less common overall based on an ADS search, it's simpler and seems to be preferred by newer sources. SevenSpheres (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 26 July 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Queen of Heartstalk 14:45, 4 August 2024 (UTC)Reply


PG 1047+003UY Sextantis – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars without proper names, Bayer designations, Flamsteed designations, Gliese Catalog designations or HD numbers (the case of this star), variable-star designations are prefered over other designations. This is similar with V1400 Centauri, where the name isn't the common name, but satisfies this guideline and has the advantage of being a simpler designation. 21 Andromedae (talk) 21:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.