Talk:PSR J1719−1438 b

It suggests a core of metastable metallic hydrogen (MSMH) imo i.e. dark matter, a remnant of a stellar interior. Diamond "planet" was once a star

A new physics is emerging at last. Quark level modelling is required to confirm the metastable nature of metallic hydrogen produced in stellar interiors imo. It's been created sparingly in the lab and guess what: it's jet black. Alan Lowey — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.59.118.104 (talk) 09:47, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

What you said makes no sense. dark matter isn't this, unless you're talking about CDM baryonic dark matter like MACHOs. Why do you need QCD modeling? It's not as dense as a neutron star, or even close. The protons have not been compromised. 70.24.244.20 (talk) 07:43, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Diamond -- not

With a density of 23 g/cm³ (per the Science article) it isn't diamond (density ~3.5 g/cm³) despite all the press hype. Vsmith (talk) 18:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

True; pressure would increase diamond's density at the core, but hardly by a factor of 6. I wonder if there's a theoretical model for this presumed superdense carbon allotrope? Our article only mentions allotropes slightly (3%) more dense than diamond... --Roentgenium111 (talk) 17:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

White Dwarf Planet

I deleted all the non-sourced (except for a random blog post) nonsense about the planet being a white dwarf. White dwarf stars are composed of electron degeneracy matter which would be millions of times denser than this planet's density. Ergzay (talk) 08:22, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

It's hardly nonsense. In fact, a research paper has been published on the topic, so I'd say it deserves to be mentioned. According to that paper, the "planet" is only what's left of a white dwarf after the pulsar's radiation stripped away the overwhelming majority of its mass.

Keep in mind that what's left of the white dwarf now is only about a Jupiter mass, which is much smaller than any normal white dwarf--and remember that degenerate matter expands as the pressure on it is relieved. That can easily account for the relatively low density. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.57.211.237 (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on PSR J1719-1438 b. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110914234539/http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/public/pr/pr-pulsar-august2011-en.html to http://www.mpifr-bonn.mpg.de/public/pr/pr-pulsar-august2011-en.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:31, 12 June 2017 (UTC)