Talk:Pacific Green Party

Notability?

Why is a state chapter of a national organization sufficiently notable to have a separate Wiki article? Especially as the bulk of the article is just a cut and paste of material from the article about the national party. TechBear | Talk | Contributions 16:19, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Pacific Green Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070927201136/http://ao.nictusa.com/ao/no/060036.html to http://ao.nictusa.com/ao/no/060036.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070928115846/http://www.greenscc.org/FrameWhoWeAre.htm to http://www.greenscc.org/FrameWhoWeAre.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120109100425/http://www.gp.org:80/elections/officeholders/index.php to http://www.gp.org/elections/officeholders/index.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

More issues besides citations

There are more issues with this article besides the general lack of citations.

• This paragraph is one very long and barely coherent sentence:

"In 2020 the Lane County chapter of the PGP contended with the PGP Statewide Coordinating Committee, energized by the strength of Lane’s appeal to constituencies on the libertarian and right sides, as well as the left, evidenced by large numbers of signatures collected to support Lane affiliated candidates for Federal office, which horizontally challenged the SCC that was deemphasizing anti-imperialism while credulous on Russia-gate, even as party registration had declined by approximately 20% relative to 2016."

• Besides that, the use of the word "credulous" is strange; it makes me wonder if the author knew the definition of the word. If the editor did understand it, such a claim needs extra support. Otherwise, I'd suspect an NPOV problem.
• The lists need updating.
• There are large gaps in the history, and filling them in some would improve the article.

My list of articles to work on is getting long, but this will be on it. Dgndenver (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2022 (UTC)