Talk:Packard One-Ten
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Bjenks in topic Having it both ways?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Having it both ways?
editThis article's last sentence reads For 1942, Packard made a decision to retain numerical designated models within its senior line and the One-Ten reverted back to being called Packard Six. Uh, huh? I take it this says that the 1942 Six was NOT called "One-Ten", not being part of the "senior line". But, if "One-Ten" was not applied to 1942 models, why are we shown an illustration of a "1942 One-Ten"? Who is wrong—Beverly R Kimes, author of the sole reference listed (not cited); and/or the WP contributor and/or the judge of the concours d'élégance award worn by this vehicle which the owner describes as a "Packard Custom"? Can someone in the know make this a little clearer for me, please? Cheers Bjenks (talk) 01:41, 16 August 2008 (UTC)