Talk:Padmasali (caste)

Notable names must be sourced

If a name in the "notable names" list does not have an associated article here, Wikipedia requires that the subject's notability be verifiable via a reliable source. I've deleted some names of highly dubious notability, and left others. If no sources are provided, all of the names will be removed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 04:06, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

Change of infobox

I have changed the community infobox to a caste infobox as Padmashali caste is considered as a separate caste. 59.92.148.182 (talk) 05:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

List of Famous Padmashalis

Hello 71.229.74.159, please do not vandalise the list of famous Padmashalis. They are sourced. I don't know what is your motive behind this vandalism. Please explain the reason why you are deleting some of the members, either here on the talk page or if at all you are editing again. Rammi123 (talk) 05:12, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Sources

Most of the references used in this article are not reliable sources by Wikipedia standards. Blogs like padmashali-blog.blogspot.com are self-published sources, and are not acceptable. Caste websites such as akhilabharatapadmashalisangham.org and akhilpadmashalisamaj.com are not third-party sources, and not considered reliable either. I'll remove the content supported by these sources in a few days, unless these sources are replaced with reliable sources. utcursch | talk 03:04, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Padmashali. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150526095024/http://docsio.net/doc/2229714/view---tirumala-tirupati-devasthanams to http://docsio.net/doc/2229714/view---tirumala-tirupati-devasthanams

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:47, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Snippet views

I have just removed some recently-added content because I think it relies on "snippet views" of the cited sources. Snippet views on Google Books are insufficient to provide proper context. For example, one of the sources does indeed mention the ancient text but we do not know whether the author who mentions it then goes on to examine the claim made by that text. - Sitush (talk) 19:25, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Raj era sources

Why Wikipidia Do not Refer Raj era sources?? Rushi101 (talk) 12:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

They are not considered reliable for various reasons, including them mostly being written by amateurs, adhering to outlandish theories of scientific racism, being often reliant on translated statements made by vested interests etc. - Sitush (talk) 13:01, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Copyright

The repeated reinstatement of copyrighted content, however much other sites may have also copied it over the years, is not acceptable. If we go back to the very first edits on this article in 2007, it is obvious that it was copied from this blog entry for 2005. Eg: look around the phrase Caste communities involved in the leather and wool-based household industries - which perhaps have an older history than cloth weaving.

I've dug around the Wayback Machine and the article history. It seems to me that most of the content, all the way up to its occasional 14000-character size, has been published earlier on that blog or on similar community-based websites that are listed as external links in whichever diff you choose to pick from way back when.

It has to stop. Read WP:COPYRIGHT. - Sitush (talk) 22:03, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

I've removed some more copyvio, recently added from a book. The website https://web.archive.org/web/20130717083848/http://www.aponline.gov.in:80/apportal/departments/departments.asp?dep=03&org=111, produced by the Government of Andhra Pradesh, has a different caste list from that in the article. However some of these subcastes are listed in the book. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for spotting that extra issue. The book is effectively a primary source and it is outdated. The present lists are available via the websites of the National Commission for Backward Classes and similar but they are notoriously ambiguous. - Sitush (talk) 02:14, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Families

Please do not add allegedly famous family names to this article unless you provide a reliable source that shows them to be both "famous" and actually from the community. Please also read the information at WP:WTAF. - Sitush (talk) 06:37, 8 October 2018 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 June 2021

KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 22:14, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

The padmashalis are not shudras .they belongs to vysya varna. Their origins arr from brahmins as in ancient india many castes changed their profession based on society need. Its not a myth. They are descendants of markandeya rishi and its not a myth. No one created myths .its their origin .they are born in markandeya bloodline .There are misleading mistakes and disrespectful mistakes .please correct them

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2021

KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 00:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Padmashalis are of vysya varna who oroginated from brahmins. They are not shudras .kindky change it .

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Bsoyka (talk · contribs) 01:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2021 (2)

KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Padmashalis are not shudras .they didnt become brahmins from sanskritisation. They originated from brahmins then invested in weaving and textile business. The wikipedia article on padmashalis is very misleading .They descendant from markendeya rishi . Here is the deep explanation of padmashali caste .kindly edit and remove the misleading mistakes .  

Link https://padmashali.webs.com/

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2021 (3)

KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 02:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
The padmashalis are brahmins who are aryans who migrated to south India from north India and developed special skills and invested in weaving and textile business . They are classified as business caste or Vysya varna .they changed their varna or caste from brahmins to Vysya according to the society needs .add this . They don't belong to shudra who are farmers and labours who are not related to the brahmins .  add the photo which is there at the bottom of the page sir for family tree of padmashalis origin as I provided .here is the link. And also you can add the  other information too, if you allow me I will also add or you can add. Link is here 

https://padmashali.net/akhila-bharata-padmashali-sangham/padmashali-vamsam.php

Thank you sir . KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 02:15, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 09:11, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

I provided a link sir. Please check . KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 09:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

https://padmashali.net/akhila-bharata-padmashali-sangham/padmashali-vamsam.php

Here is the link KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 10:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 June 2021 (4)

KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Padmashalis are not shudra origin .This line is totally wrong. They are categorized as vaishya varna .they have brahmin origin who invested in weaving and textile business .

Here is the link of the source from official community http://www.padmashali.ca/our-community They invested in textile business and weaving . They are not shudra origin but vaishya origin or business class . Remove the shudra origin which is incorrect . KnowledgeHunter9090 (talk) 16:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: That is not a reliable secondary source. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 22:46, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Remove unverified information

The padmashali are not of shudra origin. Just because an author added his views and published a book that does not become a reliable source... The motive of this information is to defame the caste.. please delete this information as this kind of information provides incorrect view of a certain community.. Tummavinod (talk) 03:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

please respond to this query? U do not have right to add unverified information or any author personal views as facts... please change the details of the article Tummavinod (talk) 10:44, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 June 2021

About Padmashalis it is written as shudra origin which is wrong and they are categorized as vaishyas who engaged in textile business and weaving. Thy ooginated from brahmins then took up weaving and textile business. The matter written about them is poorly sourced and not reliable. Change their origin from shudra to vaishya. And mention their family lineage and roots as mentioned in this official source of the community. http://www.padmashali.ca/our-community AmericanCake (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 June 2021 (3)

As another editor said padmashalis are not shudras in origin. Here is the source the padmashalis are f brahmin origin who trace their paternal ancestry to markandeya rishi which is also their gotra(paternal ancestry in hindu society). They invented in weaving textile industry which is again not shudra work but it's a vaishya work(which is business class). Shudra is labor class and farmers which is not even related to it. The book citation here mentioned is not reliable as anyone who writes without evidence and proper research we can't accept it as reliable. It's misleading. Change shudra to brahmin. And write how they changed their occupation in later period of time into textile business and weaving. Here's the link https://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=79495 Kindly change thank you. AmericanCake (talk) 20:25, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Morneo06 (talk) 20:41, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 June 2021 (4)

padmshalis are not of shudra origin. Padmashalis are of brahmin origin. Later invested in textile vaishya business occupation. Chand from shudra origin to brahmin origin. Source

https://www.daijiworld.com/news/newsDisplay.aspx?newsID=79495

Thank you. AmericanCake (talk) 21:03, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: That source is not nearly as high quality as the source currently in use. Please stop opening edit requests, it's disruptive. You can discuss on the talk page without them. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:18, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Padmashali name as caste carries highest meaning that it is caste of braminical not by birth but by deeds. That does not refute what is said in the article. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 25 June 2021 (2)

Dude, brahmin is their ancestry. They descended from brighu and markhandeya they are brahmin. You are misinterpreting words. You are unable to understand me. Atkeast remove shudra origin. They are not shudras. She is dras are labours and maids. They are not. Pamashalis are different. The book you seem to claim as reliable is not reliable as the author is not even an Indian nor he understand Indian society that book is full of false statements. Whoever writes the book it is not reliable. At least remove shudra origin. It is diarespecting the community. Shudra are different people. These people are not shudras. Shudras don't enter into temple. These people enter. Kindly understand it and cooperate. AmericanCake (talk) 22:06, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. If you persist in opening edit requests for each comment I will report you for disruption. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

The information you added that padmashali are of a certain origin itself is not verified or correct... its an authors personal views basis which you have added this information... please refrain from adding this kind of unverified information and remove the same Tummavinod (talk) 10:47, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 September 2021

Please remove Sathyam Gujja from the list of notable people, as they do not have an article, Draft:Sathyam Gujja has been repeatedly rejected for lack of notability [1] [2], and based on the username of the editor that added them to this list it seems to be self promotional spam [3]. thanks, 192.76.8.74 (talk) 20:24, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

 Done--RegentsPark (comment) 20:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 September 2021

Shiva.1asrk (talk) 18:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)Padmashali caste belongs to the Bhramin order of the hindu caste System

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Caste Status

Padmashali caste belongs to Bhrigu Shaka and they are from Markandeya Gotra and this caste highly Sanskritized with vedic rituals very men wear the Scared thread, They adopted Wearing and Vedic rituals as there work. Shiva.1asrk (talk) 19:00, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Padmashalis and their origin

Padmashalis are originally brahmins ..belongs to brahmana varna not shudras ..padmshalis are descendents of Brighu Maharshi son of brahma .. In wikipedia stating that padmashalis belong to shudra varna which is not correct ..absolutely false statement ..please make correction...and the source for this is please see wikipedia of brighu maharshi and bhargava ..you will find genealogy of padmashalis...today padmshalis are in weaving profession , cloth merchants, astrologers, purohithyam , poets , lyricists e.t.c, Shivanshuramanuja5 (talk) 10:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH CULTURE SOCIETY ISSN: 2456-6683 : HISTORY OF THE PADMASHALIS AND THEIR MIGRATION: The Padmashali sources its origin to Brugu Maharshi,followed down to Markandeya

shaali language

any information with regard to the shaali language Seetharam S (talk) 16:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

Padmashalis are not shudra origin

wikipedia stating that padmashalis belong to shudra varna is not correct ..it's a false statement ..please.correct this error immediately as this is spreading false information. 2405:201:D028:98DB:55D1:7714:7463:D156 (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 March 2023

Padmashalis are not shudra origin. They are brahmin origin. They are also called as Padma Brahmins. 2405:201:D028:98DB:55D1:7714:7463:D156 (talk) 18:14, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

https://simple.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padmashali#:~:text=The%20Padmashalis%20basically%20perform%20Brahmin,are%20identified%20as%20Padma%20Brahmins. 2405:201:D028:98DB:DD88:7A5:D9B:7CD4 (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

also padmashalis (weavers )are considered as other backward category by the Indian government.All the vaishyas origin comes under other backward category not the shudra origin. You can say that padmashalis are brahmin origin or vaishya origin. But there is no way you can mention that padmashalis are shudra origin.

No weavers community in India are from shudra origin. Please change the statement that padmashali are shudra origin and make it brahmin or vaishya origin. 2405:201:D028:98DB:DD88:7A5:D9B:7CD4 (talk) 15:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Padma Brahmins and Devanga Brahmins

Padmashalis and Devangas are Direct descendants ( blood line ) of rishis . Padmashalis came from Sage Markandeya and Devanga from Deval Maharishi ( From Lord Shiva's forehead/third eye) . The will fall either in Brahmins or Vaishya Varna . They are original brahmin's Netflix Official 10 (talk) 07:59, 11 February 2024 (UTC)