Talk:Paired difference test

Welch's test not relevant

I believe that the Welch's test and homogeneity of variance should not be mentioned in this article: when using a paired test, we effectively turn the question into a single sample test for the differences. See also http://yatani.jp/HCIstats/TTest#PairedUnpaired for a claim that paired t-test does not assume homogeneity. Am I correct? Anša (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

That is exactly right. A paired t-test does not require equal population variance in two samples, since there is effectively only one sample. 172.91.107.147 (talk) 05:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paired difference test. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://compbio.berkeley.edu/people/ed/SeqCompEval/Pairwise
• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UWWnuePMeTgJ:compbio.berkeley.edu/people/ed/SeqCompEval/+http://compbio.berkeley.edu/people/ed/SeqCompEval/Pairwise&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&source=www.google.com with https://web.archive.org/web/20080629033730/http://compbio.berkeley.edu/people/ed/SeqCompEval/ on http://compbio.berkeley.edu/people/ed/SeqCompEval/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

EDIT: First link (extreme values) is dead. Should be removed?

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)