The contents of the Pairwise coprime page were merged into Coprime integers and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Merger
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result was merge into Coprime integers. -- Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Should this article be merged into Coprime? Richard Pinch (talk) 17:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
Then articles which mentioned pairwise coprimality would have to link to a section of the coprime article. On the other hand I guess the only reason I followed the link was because I wondered what other types of coprime there were than pairwise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.106.217.169 (talk) 16:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
- I vote yes: this article will never naturally have enough information to merit being its own article, while it would work very naturally as a section or two of the article coprime. I've stuck on a template. Joel B. Lewis (talk) 00:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- I agree, and there' consensus at the other talk page, as well. I'm going ahead with the merge. Bryanrutherford0 (talk) 20:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.