Talk:Paleolithic dog

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 14.2.206.29 in topic false information
edit

I would like to mention that the type of English in articles does not have to be consistent with related articles, as long as it has strong national ties to the topic (Paleolithic dogs in Europe, not US), WP: ENGVAR's consistency only applies within an article.

Though I won't bother to change the variety, since it will have little noticeable effects on the article, and it's well already established. Editor abcdef (talk) 10:58, 12 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

false information

edit

correct name is Kniegrotte, not Kniegortte. And the genetic clear dog domestication is around 15.500 BP in the Gnirs-Cave, next to Petersfeld Cave in Brother Valley, Swabian Alps. They found all genetic Lines of dogs include Asian lines by Magdalenian Rendeer Hunter and Gatherer. In Petersfels Cave is found a Venus Figure from typ Goennersdorf. This group was the ancestors of Dog of Kesslerloch, Swiss and from 14.500 BP and Bonn-Oberkassel, 12400 BC, Hamburgian Culture. Same black coal Venusfigure is found by Venus of Monruz, Swiss. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-83719-7, A refined proposal for the origin of dogs: the case study of Gnirshöhle, a Magdalenian cave site, Baumann at al 2021, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83719-7 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:C3:E709:CA7E:31B9:402B:5134:3940 (talk) 00:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

You are well behind events: Bergstrom et al 2020 Origins and genetic legacy of prehistoric dogs. 14.2.206.29 (talk) 08:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply