The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic
The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:
Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.
With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:
Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
There is a difference between a population that became occupied by a foreign power because that foreign power wanted to increase its land holdings or natural resources. An example of this type of occupation is the Arab conquests of 5,000 miles of land from Morocco to India all these lands were Christian Jewish Zoroastrian Buddhist and Hindu
and were stolen by murderous wars to enlarge the caliphate.
The other type of occupation is when a foreign country wants to live in peace with its neighbors
but is attacked by these neighbors .The foreign country is put into a situation where it is forced to seize the lands from which the attacks against it were launched in order protect the lives of its citizens. This occupation is laudable because the foreign country only holds on
to land to preserve life . The foreign country is willing to return the “occupied”land as soon as it is sure that no new attacks will be launched against it.
The Israeli “occupation” is an example of the laudable type because Israel was not seeking to enlarge its land or natural resources and would vacate these lands,as it did the Sinai,if it was sure it would not be attacked again from these territories.
2603:7000:2303:D32F:5062:3DAA:3AC7:A2EF (talk) 12:50, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
That is false. Zionism, according to the first Zionist Congress seeks to obtain all lands in Palestine (from the river to the sea) as a ethno-religious state in accordance with Biblical claims of “historic” Israel. Specifically, Numbers 34: 1-12 and/or Ezekiel 47, 13-20. So, clearly Israel, as guided in its founding ideology IS pursuing the kind of occupation you describe as simply “increasing its lands”. 69.61.242.201 (talk) 02:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
As mentioned above it is true that the final section is not really on topic currently, but I think it can be made to be so. There are reliable sources discussing the 7th October attack and hostage-taking in the context of Palestinian resistance, and the issues thereof. This can include the reactions from countries , organisations, etc; condemnations, justifications, etc. Much can be found in the main 7th October attack article. In addition to that, the resistance to the Israeli ground campaign and war in general so far can be covered. To make such a section neutral will require calm collaboration and a range of sources. Heavy Grasshopper (talk) 10:17, 20 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Do Israeli settlers, who are armed to the teeth, and live on occupied land also count as civilians?!
Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion
@Ainty Painty: can I change the name of this to Palestinian right to armed resistance in international law? I think this proposed name would be more specific. I can move the article WP:BOLD-ly
since it is still a stub.VR(Please ping on reply)23:38, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
To explain more, I've written an article on "Palestinian right to armed resistance in international law". I'm wondering whether to copy and paste into here, or start a new article.VR(Please ping on reply)23:42, 11 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
I oppose the move and support moving it back. The Palestinian right to resist debates include both armed and non-armed resistance. It's worth noting that Israel doesn't believe that Palestinians are even entitled to non-violent resistance (eg. shooting peaceful protestors during the Great March of Return) (t · c) buidhe00:27, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm really, really busy off-line. I have read the article, however, and fixed one poor sentence in the lead with a source. I'll try to get back to this when circumstances allow, but in the meantime, if you haven't yet, you might find some hints by reading
There is a superb but very lengthy study by Yezid Sayigh which gives an in-depth coverage of the history of debates among Palestinian factions on this topic, and gives one all the background, beyond the legal questions, for it.
That is a very long haul, and I mention it just as something that might eventually interest you.The legal situation is pretty clear in any case. A state can ignore international law with impunity, behind a huge barrage of legal experts who can challenge 'ccusations' that its violations are violations, if it is forced to justify its structural violence against another people. Non-state actors are terrorists if they have recourse to counter-violence, or even if they don't (The case of Mustafa Akawi in Hebron in 1992 came to mind last night while reading about Sde Teiman. He was hauled out of his conjugal bed after midnight, and after appearing before an Israeli judge, still got pummeling and the famous whip-lash torture treatment, and died. The 'autopsy' said that at 35 years of age he'd died of hardening of the arteries. Regards Nishidani (talk) 08:48, 1 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
