Talk:Palm Beach County Library System
Latest comment: 3 years ago by EmGaGa in topic NPOV concerns
 | The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Palm Beach County Library System article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Several parts of this article seem like WP:PROMOTION and sound like they’re copied straight from the website (and some of them are WP:COPYPASTE). Can something be done about this? Someone please correct me if I’m wrong, but much of the article looks like it needs rewriting like User:ValPritt has done in one section. —174.141.182.82 (talk) 01:54, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Updated some of the citations, and reworded many passages. Stone6757 (talk) 02:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Would there be any objections to removing most of the sections that are supported only by the primary source of the official website? —67.14.236.50 (talk) 17:05, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
- None from me. — I'ma editor2022 (🗣️💬 |📖📚)
- No objection on my part. The Services section has quite a few sentences supported only by the official website as a primary source. Removing some of the more specific details about services gleaned from the primary source would make the section much more concise, as well as just summarizing some services in general. Threeorange (talk) 05:30, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's fair. EmGaGa (talk) 19:31, 11 January 2021 (UTC)