Talk:Palm Beach Pumas

Fair use rationale for Image:Palmbeachpumas.jpg

Image:Palmbeachpumas.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Red links

We should not be including red links for articles that we don't have any reason to believe will ever be created. Per WP:REDLINK, "Do not create red links to articles that will never be created". Red links are allowed if the term could "plausibly sustain an article", but there's no reason to believe all these amateur soccer players will eventually be notable enough for articles. The justification for including them was that they allow us to "track career paths for minor league players in the US" via the "what links here" tool; however, no policy or guideline page I'm aware of gives that as a good reason to keep red links in articles. This goes for all related articles.--Cúchullain ^t/c 12:18, 28 March 2011 (UTC)