Talk:Palmolive Building
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
name
editI think the discussion of the name should be cleaned up. In the fifties and sixties, I knew it as the Palmolive Building. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdammers (talk • contribs) 11:31, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
picture, please
editThis article is just begging for a picture. Isn't there a Wik editor in Chicago with a camera? Kdammers (talk) 02:56, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Name problems
editWas it really called the "Palmolive Buildihg" (as it says in the article).
And was it called Palmolive first or Playboy first? (The article says "formerly called the Playboy Building" Al Hart (talk) 00:26, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Lindbergh Beacon
editThe Lindbergh Beacon blurb needs rewrite and modern refs. I have placed dead link templates in the only ref cited and intend to rewrite pending comment. There is much available to make this a more factual article. Nickrz (talk) 18:02, 27 January 2015 (UTC)