 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The alternative cover is listed as an "Urban Outfitters-exclusive vinyl cover". This cover was also used for pre-orders from the official Years & Years store. I bought my copy from the webstore - not Urban Outfitters. MikkelCS (talk) 22:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
- I added it. Btw, User:Ss112, I just did the citations thing due to the lack of time. And FYI, I'm not claiming the artice to myself like what you're doing right now. I just expanded it when I found a bunch of usable resouces for it, and I did it all within a day. I do not even intend on watching it, and I myself would really like it if someone c/e'd it to fit a British English prose/grammar. But certainly not you, God forbid anyone should add anything useful for the article against your WP:OWN sensibilities. Chihciboy (talk) 11:41, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, User:Chihciboy "my WP:OWN sensibilities"...says the user who came in and changed everything about the page to fit their own personal preference. I don't know how it's owning a page to change the style back when it never should have been changed in the first place (WP:CITEVAR). I don't know how on Earth to you listing all citations at the bottom would save time. One would think defining them where they are first used would be the thing that saves the most time because you're finding them as you write, but God forbid that might make more sense to do. Also, if I was so hellbent on owning the page, I don't know why I'd be asking if someone could copyedit it. If English is not your first language, please get another editor to proofread what you add before adding large sections of prose to save on the time that others will inevitably have to spend later basically rephrasing everything. From the one section I looked at, in some parts I could barely understand what you meant to say. That's not me intending to insult you, it's the truth. Ss112 12:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- User:Ss112 I may have changed it not to your preference, BUT I did not do it in bad faith. If you feel that I may have caused inconvenience for everyone else for changing the style, I'm sorry for it. But you could have at least be cordial about it, It's not like I was doing it just to irritate you and everyone else, and the worst part is you just quickly assumed that my actions were filled with bad intentions. Have you ever once considered to discuss this issue on the talk page? You could have just talk to me here on in my talk page, and I would gladly say yes to removing the refs there. And yes, I may have done it to save time, as some refs can be used more than once, and when the bots are finished crawling to those pages one can easily add their respective archive links. And FYI, based on my experience, GA/FA reviewers often ask to make sure the websites in the work parameter not to be italicized. But the default setting was always italicized, so some editors added the noitalic template to subvert it. So tell me if there's another way do it. See what I did there? I'm open to reccomendations too. Should I not expand articles on your watchlist? Chihciboy (talk) 14:46, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, User:Chihciboy "my WP:OWN sensibilities"...says the user who came in and changed everything about the page to fit their own personal preference. I don't know how it's owning a page to change the style back when it never should have been changed in the first place (WP:CITEVAR). I don't know how on Earth to you listing all citations at the bottom would save time. One would think defining them where they are first used would be the thing that saves the most time because you're finding them as you write, but God forbid that might make more sense to do. Also, if I was so hellbent on owning the page, I don't know why I'd be asking if someone could copyedit it. If English is not your first language, please get another editor to proofread what you add before adding large sections of prose to save on the time that others will inevitably have to spend later basically rephrasing everything. From the one section I looked at, in some parts I could barely understand what you meant to say. That's not me intending to insult you, it's the truth. Ss112 12:43, 7 August 2018 (UTC)