Talk:Pamyat
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pamyat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was edited to contain a total or partial translation of Национально-патриотический фронт «Память» from the Russian Wikipedia. Consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Holy Russian Empire!?!?!?!?
editIs this a Holy Russian empire flag logo copy with the Swastijesus and eagle!?!?!?!? but seriously though, The English wikipedia is the only version of the coat of arms I could find. every other depiction has an eagle and the St. George slaying the dragon in place of Swastijesus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.116.44.88 (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
- Is that a tno reference RussiaIsWayTooBig (talk) 16:32, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
Proper references
editThis page has been marked in need of references since 2007. That is a bit absurd. I trimmed down some of the content that seemed overstated but if it is properly supported please re-insert the anti-semitism and such with clear attribution. Also please note the assorted cleanup done in the last edit and do a proper fix rather than a simple revert. I'm not clear that this is not in fact a simple nationalistic group with some apparently strange conspiracy theories. The use of the swastika in some form is not particularly damning given its long history and the probable identity of the slavic peope as the descendants of the indo-europeans. Not to offer OR or POV, I would just like to see a fair and accurate article. I welcome proper insertion of in-line refs if this is in any part a genuine racist organisation. Obotlig (talk) 04:58, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
"The use of the swastika is not particularly damning"..........?? Since when? Don't know if you've kept up with events over the last 96 years but the swastika stopped being an emblem of anything else EXCEPT the Nazi Party since, oh around 1920. Any person, place or thing that uses this symbol knows damn well what it means and who they're trying to intimidate. And another thing my fine scholar, Indo-European encompasses a family of languagesItalic text with a common core, NOT any one ethnicity, Slavic or otherwise. LOL. How much more do you REALLY not know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.51.145.103 (talk) 07:25, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
It would be important to bring uo the KGB influence of this organization. There are many reasons to suppose that the Soviet security forces were involved already at an early phase. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.89.115.225 (talk) 04:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
RfC
editAn RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 17:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Symbol on Logo
editI think it should be called the "Jesuswastika", LOL. 74.90.57.148 (talk) 23:04, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
Far right?
editUh...no. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.5.170 (talk) 03:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Pamyat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041011214542/http://www.nasledie.ru/oborg/2_18/0010/01.htm to http://www.nasledie.ru/oborg/2_18/0010/01.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)