Talk:Pandeism
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Dropping here: [1] Hyperbolick (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
The 'Olson' here is Alan M. Olson. Hyperbolick (talk) 10:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Here's the whole quote.
According to [Alan M.] Olson, Jaspers's perception of ciphers stresses the centrality of the individual experiencing the constitution of the symbol and activity involved in interpreting it, compared with Christian theology, which grants a different weight to the individual and to the symbolic aspects of religion. In his opinion, the fear that pandeism or the tendency to reduce faith into the external means by which it is obtained would eventually lead to the viewing of these means as having purely subjective, and also mutable, validity, was behind the Catholic church's emphasis on the objective truth of the symbols themselves in relation to the individual religious experience.
- Ronny Miron, Karl Jaspers: From Selfhood to Being (Rodopi 2012), p. 249, ISBN 9042035315.
Ping
edit@Harold the Sheep: Noticed your good eye in areas similar to this. Wondering, might you have a look through and share your thoughts on this page? Hyperbolick (talk) 23:27, 10 December 2022 (UTC)