 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge
editIt does not seem sensible to have separate articles for the river and the valley - particularly with inconsistent spelling. Mhockey (talk) 09:23, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose A river is not a valley. In fact a river need not have a valley, nor a valley, a river. No reason to merge to different geographical features. Rmhermen (talk) 05:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- comment This is true; however, in this case, both articles are rather short; does the river really need it's own article? Is it notable enough or would it be sufficient as a section in the article about the valley (or vice versa)? --KarlB (talk) 05:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia generally holds all rivers (and town, mountains, etc.) are notable. Rmhermen (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
- comment This is true; however, in this case, both articles are rather short; does the river really need it's own article? Is it notable enough or would it be sufficient as a section in the article about the valley (or vice versa)? --KarlB (talk) 05:59, 1 July 2012 (UTC)