Talk:Pantelleria Vecchia Bank Megalith
Latest comment: 3 months ago by Alexor65 in topic Other researchers say it is a natural object
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of the object be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Italy may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
when above ground?
editit seems like bad editing when an article says "around 10,000 years ago" in one place and then "around 9500 years ago" a few lines later. --142.163.194.97 (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
anomalous?
editNone of the (accessible) references use the word 'anomalous'. Perhaps 'unstudied' would be better. And of 'uncertain' origin? That implies there are ideas that are not quite proven. Is this the case? Then give them. If not, say "unknown".--142.163.194.97 (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- The Roman imported obelisks as you can see List of obelisks in Rome and as out lined here [1], Pantelleria was a major trading port where Egyptian jewellery where found. So it seems to me the simplest explanation is the megalith was a lost good at sea, probably during a storm it fell off board. The hole(s) through out it are probably means to secure or tie it during transports. Mightyname (talk) 21:19, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Other researchers say it is a natural object
edit"natural conclusion that it is not a manufactured product, but a natural product." LINK: http://www.archeologiasubacquea.org/2015/09/monolite.html Alexor65 (talk) 21:50, 29 June 2024 (UTC)