Talk:Pantomath
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 29 September 2006. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pantomath article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Added category
editI have categorized this page as requested by Category needed. If anyone has a more accurate category for this article, please feel free to add in the necessary details. --Siva1979Talk to me 19:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
"works are so counted"
editThis sentence is rather confusing: "Given that the actual instances of the word usage in written works are so counted, most statements about the usage or the meaning of the word are bound to remain speculative."
What does that mean? Are these works very limited in number? Is the term rarely used? If so, I would tend to agree with the messagebox that it should be merged or deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.239.96.226 (talk) 10:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Pantomath versus Philomath
editBoth of these seem to mean roughly the same thing. Perhaps consider merging — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.24.21.137 (talk) 21:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)