| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panzer IX and Panzer X article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Complete Re-write
editI re-wrote the entire text from scratch, and added a couple of categories. Someone else added a conceptual drawing as well, so I upgraded the article to a Start-class article. Since there is not much else to say about the subject, I really doubt the article will go any further.
Since the other comments here were about actions that had already been done a long time ago, I deleted them all.Christian Ankerstjerne (talk) 13:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe would have been better archiving old comments? Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:54, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Added Image
editAdded another image. The previous photographs were copyright inflictions, so this should fix it permanently. Not the prettiest thing, but on the other hand, it's the closest to the original source you can get.Christian Ankerstjerne (talk) 14:47, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
- The current image is about the "Panzer IX", anything about the "Panzer X"? Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:58, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Why Not a Start-class Article?
editI agree it's short, but on the other hand, there's little left to add to the article. It cites a reference for its contents. Christian Ankerstjerne (talk) 22:48, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Have amended the infobox, classed "start" as proposed. Regards, DPdH (talk) 12:57, 7 March 2014 (UTC)