This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Overall this is a concise, complete, clearly written, and interesting article. I appreciate that it gives a complete overview of the dish as well some historical background and a look into the possible origins of Papadzules. This brings it beyond a entry about preparation and gives the subject more encyclopedic relevance. I also liked that there are significant links to other relevant Wiki articles, especially when considering terminology that I did not already know.
A couple points, while the article is well referenced, I would have appreciated more external links.
The final sentence of the second paragraph: "The modern pim can range in thickness from the height of three tortillas up to approximately half an inch.[8]" I wasn't sure what this had to do with the rest of the paragraph. What is pim?
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I thought that the article was well written and valid. I liked the breakdown of the page and how it explained how to prepare the dish in the final section. The site included specific references and it was linked to other pages that were relevant to this topic. I was confused by the first reference, Kennedy, but I later realized that she was linked to the history of the dish through her book.
