This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The second two-thirds of the article are headed with:
The following text is from the website of the Columbia University Advanced Papyrological Information System...
I searched a bit at the Columbia University Advanced Papyrologica Information Systems website, and I could find no reason to believe that the text is public domain. The text appears to be from a grant application to the NEH (National Endowment for the Humanities). Does such text automatically become public domain? -Rholton 00:38, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)
The APIS site is definitely intended for public use. Any restrictions are stipulated by the various participating members (as noted on the site). —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kr2ft (talk • contribs) 15:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The modern papirologia born in Italy in Velletri in the museum of the famous Cardinal Stefano Borgia, with Charta Borgiana, a papyrus arrived in the West, which described a group of workers who worked at a water channel in Tebtynis 192-193 AD. Published in 1778 under the title:"Charta Papyracea Graece scripta Musei Borgiani Velitris"
managing director — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metabo82 (talk • contribs) 00:42, 6 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
_01.svg){kind=small}
