Talk:Para-alpine skiing classification/GA1
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Wizardman in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this but the review likely won't start for at least another 48 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Lead
" Some classification systems are governed by bodies other than International Paralympic Committee Alpine Skiing for systems not used in international competition."
Such as?- Special Olympics. added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
"intellectual disabilities"
Mental disabilities?- No, it is always referred to as "intellectual disabilities"."mentally retarded" has been deprecated for a generation. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Political correctness eh?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
"The first classification systems for para-alpine skiing were developed in Scandinavia,"
Do we have a year/period for this?- 1960s. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Link Sit skiers and mono-ski
- The two point to the same article, which duly informs the reader that they are not quite the same thing. Added a link to mono-ski. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Definition
- Do LW1, LW2, LW3, LW4, LW5/7, LW6/8, and LW9 have articles? And the C and B class ones? Link them?
- Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- What does Locomotor Winter mean?
- It's just an English word. Linked to the Wiktionary article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Remove excessive links to Amputation, Paraplegia and Visual acuity, just once will do.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Governance
- International Paralympic Committee Alpine Skiing. Link?
- Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
" ISMWSF In 2003, ISMWSF merged with ISOD, and changed its name to the International Wheelchair and Amputee Sports Federation (IWAS) in 2004."
Beginning of the sentence doesn't make sense.- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- All issues addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
Article seems to provide a pretty decent overview of this. However, several photographs might help liven it up a little, only if relevant of course.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Issues addressed, so article passes. Wizardman 04:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)